VAR decisions will be explained at next month’s Club World Cup. Both supporters in the stadium and viewers at home will be able to understand the reasoning behind the VAR’s calls.
If this works in Morocco next month, the International Football Association Board (Ifab) may apply it to all FIFA competitions.
This may include the 2023 Women’s World Cup. That will be held in Australia and New Zealand starting on July 20.
You may also like: Where is Bolsonaro now? While he is in the hospital, his wife tells
The test setup will be very familiar to cricket and NFL fans at home. The goal is to prevent the rising frustration among supporters by keeping them up to date.
FA chief executive says
To paraphrase Bullingham: “We don’t think fans (are) getting enough information” (FA Chief Executive).
He added, “We’re testing it in the toughest environment because we think domestic leagues will be easier.”
Throughout the World Cup in Qatar, the Ifab has been lauded for its “successful” strategy of stoppage time.
For his part, Bullingham predicted fewer injuries after there was no longer any reason to remain on the ground.
However, the Premier League has decided against implementing a temporary concussion substitution trial during the upcoming season.
Ifab held a meeting at Wembley on Wednesday in response to a proposal by Fifpro and the World Leagues Forum. So that they can implement a protocol test in the Premier League, MLS, and Serie A. (BBC)
Advocates have drawn attention to a problem with the 2020 concussion ruling. In certain cases, a player with a probable head injury was allowed to continue playing before being taken off the field.
However, FA claims that since no agreement was reached, the ongoing trial would continue indefinitely.
Bullingham stated that he and others believed it would be worthwhile to test out temporary concussion substitutes since they believe there are instances of players who look to have been concussed but have not been pulled off the field.
There’s benefit in conducting the review away from the pitch, and the reasoning goes, you can learn more in 15 minutes than in three.
As a result, “the decision was taken to reinforce the application of the permanent model through more education, more evidence, and more urgency,” so that the concept of the right decisions being made becomes reality.
The findings led to the conclusion that there is no loophole in the law, Bullingham added.